This is the third and final installment of an article written by Wayne Jackson. It appeared in the November 1989 edition of the "Christian Courier" published by the Church of Christ in Stockton, CA.
Arguments For The Early Date Answered
In the absence of external evidence in support of an early date for Revelation, preterists generally rely on what they perceive as internal support for their view. In the main, their arguments are:
First, it is contended that the Gospel of John has a much smoother style of Greek than does the Apocalypse. Thus, the latter must have been written many years prior to the fourth Gospel - when the apostle was not so experienced in the literary employment of Greek. To this it may be replied:
(a) Archaeological discoveries and literary studies have recently demonstrated that along with Aramaic and Hebrew, Greek was commonly spoken among first century Palestinians. Thus John must have known and used Greek since his youth.
(b) B. B. Warfield contends that, "the Apocalypse betrays no lack of knowledge of, or command over Greek syntax or vocabulary; the difference lies, rather, in the manner in whhich a language well in hand is used, in style, properly so called; and the solution of it must turn on psychological, not chronological considerations.
(c) R. H. Charles, author of the commentary on Revelation in the "International Critical Commentary" series, and perhaps the greatest expert on apocalyptic literature, regarded the so-called "bad grammar" as deliberate for purposes of emphasis and consistent with the citation of numerous Old Testament passages. It might be noted that in the 404 verses of Revelation, Westcott & Hort's "Greek New Testament" gives over 500 references and allusions to the Old Testament.
(d) Finally, as McClintock and Strong point out, "It may be admitted that the Revelation has many surprising grammatical peculiarities. But much of this is accounted for by the fact that it was probably written down, as it was seen, 'in the Spirit', while the ideas, in all their novelty and vastness, filled the apostle's mind and rendered him less capable of attending to forms of speech. His Gospel and Epistles on the other hand, were composed equally under divine influence, but an influence of a gentler, more ordinary kind with much care, after long deliberation, after frequent recollection and recital of the facts and deep pondering of the doctrinal truths which they involve."
Second, it is claimed that Revelation must have been penned before A.D. 70 since it has no allusion to the destruction of Jerusalem; rather, it is alleged, it represents both the city and the temple as still standing. In response we note:
(a) If John wrote this work near A.D. 96, there would be little need to focus upon the destruction of Jerusalem since the lessons of that catastrophe would have been well learned in the preceding quarter of a century. However, it must be noted that some scholars see a veiled reference to Jerusalem's destruction in 11:8, where "the great city", in which the Savior was crucified (Jerusalem) is called Sodom; not merely because of wickedness, but due to the fact that it was a destroyed city of evil.
(b) The contention that the literal city and temple were still standing based upon chapter 11, ignores the express symbolic nature of the narrative. Salmon says that it is "difficult to understand how anyone could have imagined that the vision represents the temple as still standing. For the whole scene is laid in heaven, and the temple that is measured is the heavenly temple (11:19, 15:5). We have only to compare this vision with the parallel vision of a measuring reed seen by Ezekiel (ch. 40), in which the prophet is commanded to measure - surely not the city which it is stated had been demolished fourteen years previously, but the city of the future seen by the prophet in vision."
Third, some argue for an early date of the Apocalypse by asserting that the enigmatical 666 (13:18) is a reference to Nero. This is possible only by pursuing the most irresponsible form of exegesis. to come up with such an interpretation one must: (a) Add the title "Caesar" to Nero's name; (b) Compute the letter/number arrangement on the basis of Hebrew, whereas the book was written in Greek; (c) Alter the spelling of Caesar by dropping the yodh in the Hebrew. All of this reveals a truly desperate attempt to find a reference to Nero in the text.
Additionally, Leon Morris has pointed out that Irenaeus discussed a number of possibilities for deciphering the 666, but did not even include Nero in his list, let alone regard this as a likely conjecture. Noted critic Theodor Zann observed that Nero was not even suggested as a possibility until the year 1831.
In view of the foregoing evidence, a very strong case can be made for dating Revelation at about A.D. 96. Accordingly, the theory of "realized eschatology" which is grounded upon the necessity of the Apocalypse having been written prior to A.D. 70, is shown to be without the necessary foundation for its successful defense, to say nothing of the scores of other scriptural difficulties that plague it.
No comments:
Post a Comment